It should be perfectly possible to run multiple applications on the iPhone in a way that protects battery life:  It could limit to the last 2 or 3, it could allow the user to specify which 1 or 2 is allowed, it could wake a certain apps every minute for 5 seconds, etc.  Allowing just 2 would make a huge difference in usability.

I get the feeling Apple is not allowing it simply because then they would have to allow iPod competitors to run in the background.   So they are just protecting iTunes, giving it another year to get entrenched.

This is a huge competitive advantage: Pandora and Spotify are just some of the excellent music services, but you can’t play a game or catch up on the news while listening!

Advertisements

After their long alliance against Microsoft, Apple and Google parted ways today, and the stage is set for the great fight of the second decade.

I’m beginning to think Steve Jobs should have been the least of our worries about Apple.

First Jon Rubinstein goes to Palm to develop the Pre.  Now George Blankenship goes to Microsoft to help setup their stores.

Who will be next?

Does your company need capital but banks won’t lend in a recession? How much are your servers worth?

Get on the cloud and sell your equipment!  No credit checks, no commitments.  Just pay as you go.

It’s not just a matter of lowering your capital structure but rather monetizing what you have at a time when money is tight.  Do it quick, before eBay is loaded with used gear and prices crash.

Utility computing makes sense long term, but even more so in the current environment.

It’s reminiscent of how the dot-com bust and 9/11 both benefitted Open Source, as many IT departments, their budgets slashed, started adopting Linux and even OSS databases and application servers.

In case you haven’t seen their ads everywhere online and TV, yes, they are in the middle of an ad blitz.

What caught my eye though is that Google’s AdSense controls don’t seem to be working, so publishers are unable to turn them off!

YouTube is making Gil Scott-Heron look bad.

I can’t wait for network TV to die already.

I believe Apple is about to do for TV what they did for cellphones two years ago.

Most pundits have opined on AppleTV’s shortcomings, overwhelmingly declaring it a dud, even though it’s still sold more than Roku and about the same as Series 3 TIVO.  This is nonsense.

Clearly, after introducing iPhone and ATV together, Apple made a strategic decision to go all out on marketing and developing a best-in-class phone, rather than just a good phone and a good TV box.  They focused their resources rather than fighting a war on two fronts.

Fast forward to next week’s release of iPhone 3.0 which:

  • Puts the platform way ahead of the nearest competitor on a feature-by-feature basis.
  • Explodes the target market to include many new personal uses (e.g. ad hoc multi-player gaming with bonjour), industrial applications (as a sensor and device control interface), and commercial uses (e.g. handheld payment processor with attached ribbon printer).
  • Turns it into a video recording, editing and sharing tool (which BTW is sure to hasten the rise of citizen journalism).

Meanwhile in the last two years Apple has:

  • Drastically expanded the base of ObjectiveC / Cocoa developers.
  • Perfected a supporting ecosystem: App store, iTunes, push notifications.
  • Developed Open CL to squeeze more out of a low-power CPU/GPU combination.
  • Added enough movies to iTunes to make the rental service a viable alternative.

And consider how content has changed as well:

  • Low-def content has been embraced by a whole generation, not only for low-budget amateur productions but also for clips and highlights of commercial programs.
  • Podcasting of video has become viable at current hosting costs and broadband speeds.
  • Commercial podcasts are increasing as providers free themselves from licensing restrictions.
  • Hybrid models are developing.  For example Current TV delivers via cable, website and podcast.

This confluence of factors creates a perfect opportunity for Apple to kickstart the switch to real IP TV, by which I mean on-demand delivery of content produced by millions of sources (not the same 500 channel all-or-nothing model simply delivered over IP).

I believe this Summer, having placed the iPhone in an overwhelming competitive position, Apple will repurpose its iPhone engineering and marketing resources to the ATV, and shortly thereafter release a major overhaul of the software, including an API.  This will be followed by an App Store, and push notifications.

By the end of the year viewers will be watching Youtubes recommended by friends, the day’s extended family videos (recorded with their iPhones), the news (DailyKosTV, Democracy Now or Pajamas TV), the sports wrap-up podcast from a small state university in Oregon, a BBC drama, and CSI.  All from the couch/bed and without having to click around, hunched over a small computer monitor.

And because it costs Apple nothing to deliver it, each provider is free to use their preferred revenue model: free, ad supported, subscription or paid hosting.

I will be so happy to ditch cable and stop paying $60 to watch a couple of shows a week.